Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

How To Use These Guides

Authors
Affiliations
Archaeology Data Service
Centre for Digital Antiquity

The results from ‘Strategies for Digital Data’, a survey on digital data in archaeology carried out in the UK by Archaeology Data Service Condron et al., 1999, 29-32, and a more recent survey in the US by Digital Antiquity Watts, 2011, show that a wide variety of organisations are both creating and retaining digital data from archaeological projects. While current methods for preservation and access to data vary widely, nearly all of these organisations agree that careful management of digital archaeological resources is an important aspect of the responsible conduct of research. For this reason the Guides to Good Practice are aimed at the following audiences:

In the UK:

In the US the following audiences are addressed by these Guides:

When to Use These Guides

Recommendations on How to Use These Guides

The audiences outlined above can, in the broadest sense, be divided into two main groups: (i) those funding and creating data and (ii) those caring for it after its creation. In many cases both of these roles may be undertaken within the same organisation, either by the same individuals or by separate departments. The following points aim to outline how both groups can best use these guides.

Data Creators and Funders

Data Retainers

Pathways Through These Guides

The Guides to Good Practice have been created in order to allow a degree of flexibility in how they can be used. As outlined in the preceding section, general preservation themes are discussed in the early chapters and are followed by chapters which look at common project lifecycle (i.e. non-technique specific and widely applicable) elements such as file naming, metadata creation and copyright. These lifecycle chapters are then followed by technique and file type-specific chapters and, finally, by chapters dealing with archive structuring and deposit. The Guides are essentially designed so that users can proceed from the introductory material to the specific chapters relevant to their data types and then on to the concluding “structuring and depositing” chapters. While all chapters have been written with a certain degree of self-containment in mind, users are advised to at least be aware of the wider preservation issues raised in the introductory chapters to these Guides when using the technique or file type focused chapters.

How to Cite These Guides

The Guides to Good Practice should be considered as a single publication encompassing a number of individually authored chapters. The different chapters can be cited as shown in the following examples:

Terms and Spelling Used in These Guides

Authors of the different chapters of the Guides hail from both the United Kingdom and the United States. Conventions of spelling and terminology used in different chapters within the Guides may vary and, as a rule, are those of the author or lead author. Extra explanatory text is provided in the relevant glossary sections when specific terminology is used or may need to be made clear.

References
  1. Condron, F., Richards, J., Robinson, D., & Wise, A. (1999). Strategies for digital data: findings and recommendations from digital data in archaeology: a survey of user needs. Archaeology Data Service, University of York.
  2. Watts, J. (2011). Policies, Preservation, and Access to Digital Resources: The Digital Antiquity 2010 National Repositories Survey. In Publications in Digital Antiquity No.
  3. Archaeology Data Service. (2011). Guides to Good Practice: Digital Archiving and the Project Lifecycle. Archaeology Data Service. 10.5284/H0P2-5584
  4. Payne, A. (2011). Laser Scanning for Archaeology: A Guide to Good Practice. Archaeology Data Service. 10.5284/RT5G-DM24